Salvage radiotherapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma after failure of CAR T-cell therapy.

Despite the success of CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T)-cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), there is a need for effective salvage strategies post-CAR T-cell therapy failure. We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients who relapsed following CAR T-cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel] or tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel]) and received salvage therapies (radiation therapy [RT] alone, systemic therapy alone, or combined modality therapy [CMT]). A total of 120 patients with post-CAR T relapsed LBCL received salvage therapies (RT alone, 25 patients; CMT, 15 patients; systemic therapy alone, 80 patients). The median follow-up from CAR T-cell infusion was 10.2 months (interquartile range, 5.2-20.9 months). Failure occurred in previously involved sites prior to CAR T-cell therapy in 78% of patients (n=93). A total of 93 sites were irradiated in 54 patients who received any salvage RT post-CAR T failure. The median dose/fractionation were 30 Gy (range, 4-50.4 Gy) and 10 fractions (range, 1-28 fractions). The 1-year local control rate for the 81 assessable sites was 84%. On univariate analysis, the median overall survival (OS) from the start date of RT was significantly higher among patients who received comprehensive RT versus focal RT (19.1 months vs. 3.0 months; P=<0.001). Twenty-three of 29 patients who received comprehensive RT had limited-stage disease. Among these, there was no difference in median OS among the patients who received RT alone versus those who received RT followed by additional therapies (log-rank P=0.2). On multivariate survival analysis, achieving PR or CR post-CAR T (hazard ratio =0.5; 95% confidence interval: 0.3-0.9; P=0.01) was independently associated with superior OS. Our findings suggest that RT can provide local control for LBCL relapsed post-CAR T-cell therapy, particularly in patients with limited-stage relapsed disease treated with comprehensive RT.

Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on toxicities after CAR T cell therapy for lymphoma and myeloma.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T) are groundbreaking therapies but may cause significant toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and cytopenias. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is often used to mitigate neutropenia after CAR T, but there is no consensus recommended strategy due to hypothesized, but largely unknown risks of exacerbating toxicities. To investigate the impact of G-CSF, we retrospectively analyzed 197 patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR T for lymphoma and 47 patients treated with anti-BCMA CAR T for multiple myeloma. In lymphoma, 140 patients (71%) received prophylactic G-CSF before CAR T (mostly pegylated G-CSF) and were compared with 57 patients (29%) treated with G-CSF after CAR T or not exposed. Prophylactic G-CSF was associated with faster neutrophil recovery (3 vs. 4 days, P < 0.01) but did not reduce recurrent neutropenia later. Prophylactic G-CSF was associated with increased grade ≥2 CRS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.11-4.18, P = 0.02), but not ICANS. In multiple myeloma, prophylactic G-CSF was not used; patients were stratified by early G-CSF exposure (≤2 days vs. ≥3 days after CAR T or no exposure), with no significant difference in toxicities. Future trials should clarify the optimal G-CSF strategy to improve outcomes after CAR T.

Coping strategies in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face sudden-onset life-threatening disease that requires intensive treatments. Although their early disease trajectory is characterized by significant, toxic side effects, limited data are available describing coping strategies among patients with AML and how these inform patient-reported outcomes. We used cross-sectional secondary data analyses to describe coping in 160 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk AML. The Brief COPE, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia were used at time of AML diagnosis to measure coping strategies, psychological distress, and quality of life (QOL), respectively. The median split method for distribution of coping domains and multivariate regression models were used to assess the relationship between coping and patient-reported outcomes. Participants (median age, 64.4 years) were mostly non-Hispanic White (86.3%), male (60.0%), and married (73.8%). Most (51.9%) had high utilization of approach-oriented coping strategies, whereas 38.8% had high utilization of avoidant coping strategies. At time of diagnosis, use of approach-oriented coping was associated with less psychological distress (anxiety, ß = -0.262, P = .002; depression symptoms, ß = -0.311, P < .001; and posttraumatic distress disorder symptoms, ß = -0.596, P = .006) and better QOL (ß = 1.491, P = .003). Use of avoidant coping was associated with more psychological distress (anxiety, ß = 0.884, P < .001; depression symptoms, ß = 0.697, P < .001; and posttraumatic distress disorder symptoms, ß = 3.048, P < .001) and worse QOL (ß = -5.696, P < .001). Patients with high-risk AML use various approach-oriented and avoidant coping strategies at time of diagnosis. Use of approach-oriented coping strategies was associated with less psychological distress and better QOL, suggesting a possible target for supportive oncology interventions.